4.6 Review

Diprosopus: A Rare Case of Craniofacial Duplication and a Systematic Review of the Literature

Journal

GENES
Volume 14, Issue 9, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/genes14091745

Keywords

diprosopus; diprosopia; craniofacial duplication; case report

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This article describes a case of a newborn with wide-spaced eyes, a broad nose, and two separate mouths. Through a systematic review of the literature, it was found that almost all cases described as diprosopus have central nervous system abnormalities, with many cases also having other associated anomalies.
In 1990, Gorlin et al. described four types of craniofacial duplications: (1) single mouth with duplication of the maxillary arch; (2) supernumerary mouth laterally placed with rudimentary segments; (3) single mouth with replication of the mandibular segments; and (4) true facial duplication, namely diprosopus. We describe a newborn born with wide-spaced eyes, a very broad nose, and two separate mouths. Workup revealed the absence of the corpus callosum and the presence of a brain midline lipoma, wide sutures, and a Chiari I malformation with cerebellar herniation. We conducted a systematic review of the literature and compared all the cases described as diprosopus. In 96% of these, the central nervous system is affected, with anencephaly being the most commonly associated abnormality. Other associated anomalies include cardiac malformations (86%), cleft palate (63%), diaphragmatic hernia (13%), and disorder of sex development (DSD) (13%). Although the facial features are those that first strike the eye, the almost obligate presence of cerebral malformations suggests a disruptive event in the cephalic pole of the forming embryo. No major monogenic contribution has been recognized today for this type of malformation.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available