4.6 Review

Building blocks of microphysiological system to model physiology and pathophysiology of human heart

Journal

FRONTIERS IN PHYSIOLOGY
Volume 14, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

FRONTIERS MEDIA SA
DOI: 10.3389/fphys.2023.1213959

Keywords

cardiac modeling; microphysiological systems; in vitro; in silico; co-cultures; biomaterials; imaging; environmental control

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Microphysiological systems (MPS) have gained increasing attention from academia and biomedical industry for their enhanced ability to mimic human physiology. MPS provide an advanced in vitro platform for studying organ and tissue functions in a more accurate manner than traditional single cell cultures or animal models. To achieve this, collaboration from multiple scientific fields is necessary to build MPS with microenvironmental control, high biological complexity, and improved recapitulation of human physiology.
Microphysiological systems (MPS) are drawing increasing interest from academia and from biomedical industry due to their improved capability to capture human physiology. MPS offer an advanced in vitro platform that can be used to study human organ and tissue level functions in health and in diseased states more accurately than traditional single cell cultures or even animal models. Key features in MPS include microenvironmental control and monitoring as well as high biological complexity of the target tissue. To reach these qualities, cross-disciplinary collaboration from multiple fields of science is required to build MPS. Here, we review different areas of expertise and describe essential building blocks of heart MPS including relevant cardiac cell types, supporting matrix, mechanical stimulation, functional measurements, and computational modelling. The review presents current methods in cardiac MPS and provides insights for future MPS development with improved recapitulation of human physiology.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available