Journal
FRONTIERS IN PHARMACOLOGY
Volume 14, Issue -, Pages -Publisher
FRONTIERS MEDIA SA
DOI: 10.3389/fphar.2023.1269863
Keywords
locally advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinoma; meta-analysis; concurrent chemo-radiotherapy; radiotherapy; accelerated fractionated radiotherapy
Categories
Ask authors/readers for more resources
In this study, we systematically evaluated the treatment effectiveness and safety of locally advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC). The results showed that concurrent treatment with nimotuzumab or conventional concurrent chemo-radiotherapy (CCRT) had significantly better efficacy and long-term survival without increasing adverse events (AEs) compared to radiotherapy alone. Accelerated fractionated radiotherapy (AFRT) showed better efficiency but had higher AEs. Concurrent cetuximab combined with radiotherapy did not show a significant advantage over radiotherapy alone.
Head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) accounts for approximately 3% of new cancer cases and 3% of all deaths worldwide. Most HNSCC patients are locally advanced (LA) at diagnosis. The combination of radiotherapy (RT), chemotherapy, targeted therapy, and immunotherapy are the primary LA-HNSCC treatment options. Nevertheless, the choice of optimal LA-HNSCC treatment remains controversial. We systematically searched public databases for LA-HNSCC-related studies and assess treatment effectiveness and safety by assessing the objective response rate (ORR), & GE;3 adverse events (AEs), overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), disease-free survival (DFS), local-region control (LRC), and disease-specific survival (DSS). 126 randomized controlled clinical trials (RCTs) were included in this study. We show that concurrent RT with nimotuzumab or conventional concurrent chemo-radiotherapy (CCRT) had significantly better efficacy and long-term survival without increasing AEs than RT alone. Accelerated fractionated radiotherapy (AFRT) showed better efficiency than conventional fractionated RT, although it had higher AEs. In addition, concurrent cetuximab combined with RT failed to show a significant advantage over RT alone.Trial registration: PROSPERO CRD42022352127.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available