4.3 Review

Is Neurotoxicity of Metallic Nanoparticles the Cascades of Oxidative Stress?

Journal

NANOSCALE RESEARCH LETTERS
Volume 11, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

SPRINGEROPEN
DOI: 10.1186/s11671-016-1508-4

Keywords

Metallic nanoparticles; Brain; Neurotoxicity; Oxidative stress; Reactive oxygen species

Funding

  1. Science and Technology Foundation of the Health and Family Planning Commission of Guizhou province, China [gzwjkj2015-1-026]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [81550011]
  3. Natural Science Foundation of Guangdong Province of China [2015A030313299]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

With the rapid development of nanotechnology, metallic (metal or metal oxide) nanoparticles (NPs) are widely used in many fields such as cosmetics, the food and building industries, and bio-medical instruments. Widespread applications of metallic NP-based products increase the health risk associated with human exposures. Studies revealed that the brain, a critical organ that consumes substantial amounts of oxygen, is a primary target of metallic NPs once they are absorbed into the body. Oxidative stress (OS), apoptosis, and the inflammatory response are believed to be the main mechanisms underlying the neurotoxicity of metallic NPs. Other studies have disclosed that antioxidant pretreatment or co-treatment can reverse the neurotoxicity of metallic NPs by decreasing the level of reactive oxygen species, up-regulating the activities of antioxidant enzymes, decreasing the proportion of apoptotic cells, and suppressing the inflammatory response. These findings suggest that the neurotoxicity of metallic NPs might involve a cascade of events following NP-induced OS. However, additional research is needed to determine whether NP-induced OS plays a central role in the neurotoxicity of metallic NPs, to develop a comprehensive understanding of the correlations among neurotoxic mechanisms and to improve the bio-safety of metallic NP-based products.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available