4.6 Article

Prognosis value of microscopic bile duct invasion in hepatocellular carcinoma: A multicenter study

Journal

CANCER MEDICINE
Volume -, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/cam4.6650

Keywords

bile duct invasion; hepatocellular carcinoma; survival; vascular invasion

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study evaluated the prognostic significance of microscopic bile duct invasion (MiBDI) in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) after R0 resection. The results showed that isolated MiBDI did not influence overall survival (OS), while the presence of both bile duct and vascular invasion (MiBDI+MVI+), microscopic vascular invasion alone (MiBDI-MVI+), and macroscopic bile duct invasion (MaBDI) were associated with worse OS.
ObjectiveTo evaluate the prognostic significance of microscopic bile duct invasion (MiBDI) in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) following R0 resection.Patients and MethodsPatients who underwent R0 resection for HCC at nine medical centers were stratified into five groups: neither bile duct nor vascular invasion (MiBDI-MVI-), microscopic bile duct invasion alone (MiBDI+MVI-), both microscopic bile duct and vascular invasion (MiBDI+MVI+), microscopic vascular invasion alone (MiBDI-MVI+), and macroscopic bile duct invasion (MaBDI). Overall survival (OS) was assessed using Kaplan-Meier analysis, and independent risk factors of OS were determined using Cox proportional hazards models.ResultsA total of 377 HCC cases were analyzed. The OS for MiBDI+MVI- was similar to that of MiBDI-MVI- (p > 0.05) but better than MiBDI+MVI+, MiBDI-MVI+, and MaBDI (all p < 0.05). Multivariate analysis indicated that MiBDI was not an independent risk factor for OS, while MVI and MaBDI were.ConclusionsOverall survival (OS) in patients with MiBDI was superior to those with MVI and MaBDI. Isolated MiBDI did not influence OS in patients with HCC after R0 resection.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available