Journal
APPLIED NEUROPSYCHOLOGY-ADULT
Volume -, Issue -, Pages -Publisher
ROUTLEDGE JOURNALS, TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/23279095.2023.2233648
Keywords
Multiple sclerosis; neuropsychology; non-pharmacological intervention; progressive disease course; rehabilitation
Categories
Ask authors/readers for more resources
This study aimed to investigate the efficacy of two non-pharmacological interventions in individuals with progressive multiple sclerosis (PMS). The results showed that computerized cognitive training improved immediate and delayed verbal memory, recognition, verbal working memory, and perceived cognitive deficits, but also led to increased anxiety. Participants who received cognitive-behavioral therapy reported high program satisfaction and less cognitive difficulties. The combination of both interventions yielded better performance in immediate and delayed verbal memory, and information processing speed, and also had positive effects on anxiety and depression.
PurposeDespite typically more pronounced cognitive and mental health issues in progressive disease courses of multiple sclerosis (PMS), rehabilitation research in this subgroup is rare. The efficacy of two non-pharmacological interventions with positive results from prior investigations was therefore examined in PMS specifically.MethodsPersons with PMS (pwPMS) received either computerized cognitive training (BrainStim), standardized cognitive-behavioral group sessions (Metacognitive Training [MaTiMS]), or a combination of both in an ambulatory setting. Neuropsychological assessment was conducted before and after the four-week intervention.Results37 participants (13 with primary/24 with secondary PMS, meanage = 52.87, SDage = 7.11, meanEDSS = 4.02, SDEDSS = 1.35) entered analyses. The BrainStim group improved in immediate and delayed verbal memory, recognition, verbal working memory, and perceived cognitive deficits while experiencing increased anxiety post-intervention. MaTiMS participants reported high program satisfaction and less cognitive difficulties at retest. The Combination group performed better in immediate and delayed verbal memory, and in information processing speed after training. Descriptive data further indicated positive effects on anxiety and depression in the MaTiMS and Combination group.ConclusionsWhile objective cognitive performance improved when explicitly trained, psychoeducative sessions contributed to subjective mental health. The combination of both approaches is thus suggested, considering the specific needs of pwPMS treated in an ambulatory setting.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available