4.6 Article

Water Reuse, a Sustainable Alternative in the Context of Water Scarcity and Climate Change in the Lisbon Metropolitan Area

Journal

SUSTAINABILITY
Volume 15, Issue 16, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/su151612578

Keywords

water reuse; climate change; urban water management; Lisbon Metropolitan Area

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Water scarcity drives changes in water management to separate potable water from non-potable uses. Urban water reuse is a significant tool for municipalities to tackle water resource pressure and should be included in water management strategies. This paper explores the benefits and barriers of water reuse in the Lisbon Metropolitan Area and provides implementation examples covering potable and non-potable as well as direct and indirect reuse.
Water scarcity is a driver for society to rethink water management and change the paradigm of use to a fit-for-purpose approach-i.e., separating potable water for human consumption (drinking, cooking or personal hygiene) from all non-potable uses that do not require the same quality level. In this context, urban water reuse is a relevant tool for municipalities and metropolitan areas when dealing with pressure on water resources, among several alternative water sources that can be considered in a site-specific and integrated manner. Through the available literature and specific case studies in the Lisbon Metropolitan Area, this paper explores the benefits and barriers of water reuse and intends to support local authorities in including water reuse in their water management strategies. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first paper focusing on Portugal and the Lisbon Metropolitan Area that globally examines governance, economic, legislative and social aspects regarding water reuse and presents specific implementation examples covering potable and non-potable as well as direct and indirect reuse.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available