4.6 Article

Design and Assessment of Children's Pencil Holder for Chinese Writing

Journal

SUSTAINABILITY
Volume 15, Issue 16, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/su151612421

Keywords

handwriting difficulty; anthropometric measurement; Chinese writing; pencil holder; product design

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Incorrect pencil-holding posture affects children's handwriting and learning in Chinese. This study presents a new pencil holder design for Chinese writing, based on hand curve data obtained from 27 children holding clay. The study also evaluated the writing quality of three types of pencil holders using Apple pencil devices and iPads, with 30 children writing representative Chinese structures. The findings offer guidance to occupational therapists and elementary school teachers in correcting children's pencil holding.
Incorrect pencil-holding posture is the main cause of children's handwriting difficulties and significantly impacts their learning and development. Most pencil holders are used to write English letters, which may not be suitable for the Chinese writing environment. Therefore, this study designed a pencil holder suitable for children to write in Chinese. Two experiments were conducted herein: (1) Measurement and design of the new pencil holder and (2) Chinese handwriting efficiency detection. Firstly, 27 children were asked to hold clay to derive the hand curves of pencil holding posture and measure curve data using a contour gauge for designing a new universal pencil holder. Secondly, 30 children wrote seven representative structures of Chinese words using iPad with Apple pencil devices to compare the three types of pencil holders for writing quality assessment. The results of this study can provide a suitable shape design of the pencil holder for children in a Chinese writing environment and provide reference directions for occupational therapists and elementary school teachers to correct children's pencil holding.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available