4.6 Article

Environmental Impact Assessment of Nesjavellir Geothermal Power Plant for Heat and Electricity Production

Journal

SUSTAINABILITY
Volume 15, Issue 18, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/su151813943

Keywords

life cycle assessment; environmental indicators; geothermal energy; exergy; district heating system; non-condensable gases reinjection

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This research focuses on the environmental benefits of reducing non-condensable gas emissions from the Nesjavellir geothermal power plant in Iceland. By conducting a life cycle evaluation, the study analyzes the overall environmental effects of producing 1 kWh of electricity and 1 kWh of thermal energy. The results show that electricity production has a greater environmental impact compared to heat production, and implementing an abatement system can significantly reduce global warming potential and external environmental costs.
This work is focused on presenting the main results and discussions concerning the environmental benefits of reducing the non-condensable gases emitted from the Nesjavellir geothermal power plant. The primary objective of this study is to conduct a life cycle evaluation to analyse the overall environmental benefit effects of producing 1 kWh of electricity and 1 kWh of thermal energy in the geothermal power plant at Nesjavellir, which is located in Iceland. The assessment is performed both before and after implementing an abatement system designed to reduce CO2 and H2S gases. The production of geothermal energy is increasing every year and, therefore, it is crucial to identify and quantify the key environmental factors of producing this type of energy and improvements for the future energy transition of the energy generation sector. Firstly, the results show that the environmental impact of electricity production is higher compared to heat production. More in detail, the emissions due to the nature of the geothermal fluid and the construction phase represent the most relevant environmental load for both electricity and heat production for nearly all the 18 environmental impact indicators studied. Furthermore, considering the abatement system for the non-condensable gas emissions, reductions of 78% and 60% in global warming potential is achieved for a production of 1 kWh of electricity and 1 kWh of thermal energy. In terms of external environmental costs, the implementation of an abatement system results in a reduction exceeding 95% for both electricity and thermal energy production per kilowatt-hour. The outcomes obtained from both the baseline scenario and the application of the abatement system undeniably prove that the latter results in a substantial decrease in the overall environmental impacts linked to the generation of 1 kWh of electricity and 1 kWh of heat, encompassing a notable reduction in external environmental costs (externalities).

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available