4.6 Article

Impact of Natural Disasters on Household Income and Expenditure Inequality in China

Journal

SUSTAINABILITY
Volume 15, Issue 18, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/su151813813

Keywords

natural disasters; income inequality; expenditure inequality; poverty alleviation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study is the first to explore the impact of natural disasters on household income in China. The findings show that natural disasters increase income inequality, especially for poor households.
Natural disasters have been demonstrated to cause devastating effects on economic and social development in China, but little is known about the relationship between natural disasters and income at the household level. This study explores the impact of natural disasters on household income, expenditure, and inequality in China as the first study of this nature for the country. The empirical analysis is conducted based on a unique panel dataset that contains six waves of the Chinese Household Income Project (CHIP) survey data over the 1988-2018 period, data on natural disasters, and other social and economic status of households. By employing the fixed effects models, we find that disasters increase contemporaneous levels of income inequality, and disasters that occurred in the previous year significantly increase expenditure inequality. Natural disasters increase operating income inequality but decrease transfer income inequality. Poor households are found to be more vulnerable to disasters and suffer significant income losses. However, there is no evidence to suggest that natural disasters significantly reduce the income of upper- and middle-income groups. These findings have important implications for policies aimed at poverty alleviation and revenue recycling, as they can help improve economic justice and enhance resilience to natural disasters.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available