4.6 Article

Investigation of Hydrothermal Performance in Micro-Channel Heat Sink with Periodic Rectangular Fins

Journal

MICROMACHINES
Volume 14, Issue 10, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/mi14101818

Keywords

micro-channel heat sink (MCHS); laminar flow; computational fluid dynamics

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This research paper investigates the laminar flow and heat transfer characteristics of a micro-channel heat sink with a variable geometry rectangular fin through computational fluid dynamics analysis. The results show that the heat sink with a variable geometry rectangular fin has better heat dissipation capacity but also larger pressure loss.
The micro-channel heat sink (MCHS) is an excellent choice due to its exceptional cooling capabilities, surpassing those of its competitors. In this research paper, a computational fluid dynamics analysis was performed to investigate the laminar flow and heat transfer characteristics of five different configurations of a variable geometry rectangular fin. The study utilized a water-cooled smooth MCHS as the basis. The results indicate that the micro-channel heat sink with a variable geometry rectangular fin has better heat dissipation capacity than a straight-type micro-channel heat sink, but at the same time, it has larger pressure loss. Based on the analysis of various rectangular fin shapes and Reynolds numbers in this study, the micro-channel heat sink with rectangular fins exhibits Nusselt numbers and friction factors that are 1.40-2.02 and 2.64-4.33 times higher, respectively, compared to the smooth heat sink. This significant improvement in performance results in performance evaluation criteria ranging from 1.23-1.95. Further, it is found that at a relatively small Reynolds number, the micro-channel heat sink with a variable geometry rectangular fin has obvious advantages in terms of overall cooling performance. Meanwhile, this advantage will decrease when the Reynolds number is relatively large.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available