4.4 Article

Perils of towers in the swamp: dark dimensions and the robustness of EFTs

Journal

JOURNAL OF HIGH ENERGY PHYSICS
Volume -, Issue 9, Pages -

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/JHEP09(2023)159

Keywords

Effective Field Theories; Models of Quantum Gravity; String and Brane Phenomenology; String Models

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Recently, there has been a revived interest in using large extra dimensions to address the dark energy problem. It has been argued that this may require a departure from Effective Field Theory (EFT) reasoning. By calculating Casimir energies in extra dimensions, the researchers show that the tower spacing scale is always an upper bound on the UV scale for the lower-energy effective theory within the domain of validity for EFTs. These towers of states have an important role in the cosmological constant problem, but there are difficulties in exploiting them.
Recently there has been an interesting revival of the idea to use large extra dimensions to address the dark energy problem, exploiting the (true) observation that towers of states with masses split, by M-N(2) = f(N)m(2), with f an unbounded function of the integer N, sometimes contribute to the vacuum energy only an amount of order m(D) in D dimensions. It has been argued that this fact is a consequence of swampland conjectures and may require a departure from Effective Field Theory (EFT) reasoning. We test this claim with calculations for Casimir energies in extra dimensions. We show why the domain of validity for EFTs ensures that the tower spacing scale m is always an upper bound on the UV scale for the lower-energy effective theory; use of an EFT with a cutoff part way up a tower is not a controlled approximation. We highlight the role played by the sometimes-suppressed contributions from towers in extra-dimensional approaches to the cosmological constant problem, old and new, and point out difficulties encountered in exploiting it. We compare recent swampland realizations of these arguments with earlier approaches using standard EFT examples, discussing successes and limitations of both.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available