4.8 Review

Templating for hierarchical structure control in carbon materials

Journal

NANOSCALE
Volume 8, Issue 45, Pages 18828-18848

Publisher

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/c6nr06695j

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. European Research Council (ERC) [239831]
  2. 'EPFL Fellows' fellowship programme - Marie Curie FP7 Grant [291771]
  3. Feodor Lynen scholarship by Alexander-von-Humboldt foundation
  4. European Research Council (ERC) [239831] Funding Source: European Research Council (ERC)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Carbon-based materials show a remarkable variety of physical properties. For this reason, they have recently been explored for many advanced applications and emerging technologies. In the absence of actual chemical functionalities in these materials, tailoring these physical properties requires control on all levels of the structural hierarchy, from the atomic structure (carbon connectivity, defects, impurities), to the supramolecular level (domain orientations), nanoscopic length scale (domain sizes, porosity), microscopic structure (morphology), and macroscopic aspects (shape, surface chemistry). When preparing carbon materials, all these features can be tailored through the use of hard, soft, or molecular templates. Based on such templating approaches or through their combination, tremendous progress towards hierarchically structured carbon materials has recently been accomplished. Novel carbon nanomaterials such as brick-walled carbon tubes, carbon nanotube forests, coral-like carbon monoliths, or functional carbon nanosheets have become available, some of which exhibit unusual combinations of electronic, mechanical, and chemical properties. This review aims to discuss how the different templating approaches allow the control of structure formation on various length scales, how hierarchical structure formation can be realized, and which challenges remain, such as the detailed control over the carbon connectivity or the surface chemistry.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available