4.6 Article

Model-Free Adaptive Resilient Control for Nonlinear CPSs With Aperiodic Jamming Attacks

Journal

IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON CYBERNETICS
Volume 53, Issue 9, Pages 5949-5956

Publisher

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/TCYB.2022.3219987

Keywords

Cyber-physical systems (CPSs); jamming attacks; model-free adaptive control (MFAC)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This article investigates the problem of model-free adaptive resilient control (MFARC) for nonlinear cyber-physical systems (CPSs) under aperiodic jamming attacks. The MFARC framework is established and an intermediate variable method is introduced to address the issue of unavailable time-varying parameters. A MFARC scheme is devised to track the desired output and solve a feasibility problem, with controller parameters obtained using linear matrix inequality technique. Additionally, a novel attack compensation mechanism is developed to mitigate the impact of aperiodic jamming attacks.
The problem of the model-free adaptive resilient control (MFARC) for nonlinear cyber-physical systems (CPSs) suffered from aperiodic jamming attacks is investigated in this article. First, the MFARC framework subject to aperiodic jamming attacks is established, and an intermediate variable method is introduced to avoid using the unavailable time-varying parameter and further eliminate an extra assumption on the sign limit of it. Then, a MFARC scheme is devised to track the desired output, where the problem of the tracking control can be transformed into solving a feasibility problem, and the controller parameters can be obtained with the aid of the linear matrix inequality technique. What is more, a novel attack compensation mechanism is developed in the MFARC scheme to mitigate the impact of aperiodic jamming attacks. In the last, an example is provided to verify the effectiveness of the devised MFARC scheme.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available