4.6 Review

Recent advances in microbiological and molecular biological detection techniques of tuberculous meningitis

Journal

FRONTIERS IN MICROBIOLOGY
Volume 14, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

FRONTIERS MEDIA SA
DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2023.1202752

Keywords

tuberculous meningitis; Mycobacterium tuberculosis; microbiology; molecular biology; research progress

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Tuberculous meningitis is the most common and deadly type of central nervous system tuberculosis. Early diagnosis is crucial for patient prognosis, but laboratory diagnosis is challenging. This review summarizes the latest research in microbiological and molecular diagnostics for tuberculous meningitis and discusses issues related to diagnostic effectiveness, laboratory infrastructure, testing costs, and clinical expertise.
Tuberculous meningitis (TBM) is the most common type of central nervous system tuberculosis (TB) and has the highest mortality and disability rate. Early diagnosis is key to improving the prognosis and survival rate of patients. However, laboratory diagnosis of TBM is often difficult due to its paucibacillary nature and sub optimal sensitivity of conventional microbiology and molecular tools which often fails to detect the pathogen. The gold standard for TBM diagnosis is the presence of MTB in the CSF. The recognised methods for the identification of MTB are acid-fast bacilli (AFB) detected under CSF smear microscopy, MTB cultured in CSF, and MTB detected by polymerase chain reaction (PCR). Currently, many studies consider that all diagnostic techniques for TBM are not perfect, and no single technique is considered simple, fast, cheap, and efficient. A definite diagnosis of TBM is still difficult in current clinical practice. In this review, we summarise the current state of microbiological and molecular biological diagnostics for TBM, the latest advances in research, and discuss the advantages of these techniques, as well as the issues and challenges faced in terms of diagnostic effectiveness, laboratory infrastructure, testing costs, and clinical expertise, for clinicians to select appropriate testing methods.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available