4.7 Article

Documentation of cognitive impairment screening amongst older hospitalised Australians: a prospective clinical record audit

Journal

BMC GERIATRICS
Volume 23, Issue 1, Pages -

Publisher

BMC
DOI: 10.1186/s12877-023-04394-z

Keywords

Cognitive impairment; Cognitive dysfunction; Cognitive screening; Older people

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study found that there is inadequate documentation of cognitive impairment screening among hospitalized older patients, with a high percentage of undocumented cases. Healthcare providers acknowledged the benefits of screening but cited lack of time and knowledge as barriers. Future research should focus on identifying feasible strategies to increase implementation of cognitive impairment screening in hospitals.
Background Failure to detect cognitive impairment (CI) in hospitalised older inpatients has serious medical and legal implications, including for the implementation of care planning. This mixed methods study aimed to determine amongst hospital in-patients aged >= 65 years: (1) Rates of documentation of screening for CI, including the factors associated with completion of screening; (2) Rates of undocumented CI amongst patients who had not received screening during their admission; (3) Healthcare provider practices and barriers related to CI screening.Methods A mixed methods study incorporating a clinical audit and interviews with healthcare providers was conducted at one Australian public hospital. Patients were eligible for inclusion if they were aged 65 years and older and were admitted to a participating ward for a minimum of 48 h. Patient characteristics, whether CI screening had been documented, were extracted using a template. Patients who had not been screened for CI completed the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) to determine cognitive status. Interviews were conducted with healthcare providers to understand practices and barriers to screening for CI.Results Of the 165 patients included, 34.5% (n = 57) had screening for CI documented for their current admission. Patients aged > 85 years and those with two or more admissions had greater odds of having CI screening documented. Among patients without CI screening documented, 72% (n = 78) were identified as cognitively impaired. While healthcare providers agreed CI screening was beneficial, they identified lack of time and poor knowledge as barriers to undertaking screening.Conclusions CI is frequently unrecognised in the hospital setting which is a missed opportunity for the provision of appropriate care. Future research should identify feasible and effective strategies to increase implementation of CI screening in hospitals.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available