4.6 Article

Experimental Investigation on Reinforcement Application of Newly Permeable Polymers in Dam Engineering with Fine Sand Layers

Journal

WATER
Volume 15, Issue 21, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/w15213761

Keywords

fine sand layer; permeable polymer; compressive strength; grouting pressure; moisture content; porosity

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This paper investigates the compressive strength and influencing factors of fine sand layers reinforced by permeable polymers. Experimental tests and analysis reveal that grouting pressure, curing days, moisture content, and porosity are the main factors affecting the strength of reinforced sand layers.
The grinding reinforcement of fine sand layers is a difficult problem in dam engineering construction. As a new type of grouting material, permeable polymer with excellent impermeability and high strength is widely used in dam engineering. In this paper, a series of compressive tests were designed considering different grouting pressures, curing days, moisture content, and porosity of fine sand. The influence of grouting parameters and sand layer conditions on the strength of fine sand layers reinforced by permeable polymers was analyzed. SEM and XDR tests were conducted to analyze the microscopic characteristics of the grouting stone. The functional calculation model of the strength and the influencing factors was established to explore the main factors influencing grouting stones. The compressive strength of grouted stones increases rapidly from the 7th to the 14th day, reaching about 96% of the maximum strength. The degree of influence of different factors is grouting pressure > moisture content > porosity. The compressive strength of the grouted stones increases with the increase of grouting pressure and the number of curing days. The compressive strength decreases with the sand layer's increasing moisture content and porosity.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available