4.6 Article

Product analysis of methane activation using noble gases in a non-thermal plasma

Journal

CHEMICAL ENGINEERING SCIENCE
Volume 130, Issue -, Pages 101-108

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ces.2015.03.019

Keywords

Plasma; Methane; Reforming; Dielectric barrier discharge; Noble gas

Funding

  1. Ministry of Science, ICT, and Future Planning (MSIP) [B551179-11-03-00]
  2. National Research Council for Science and Technology (NST) of the Republic of Korea [B551179-11-03-00]
  3. National Research Council of Science & Technology (NST), Republic of Korea [B551179-11-03-00] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

As interest grows in methane as a fuel source, its cost-effective activation has become a topic of intensive investigation. As part of these efforts, methane activation using non thermal plasma was investigated in the presence of various noble gas additives, and the product gases were analyzed. The main products in all cases were alkane species such as C2H6 and C3H8, which were produced independently of the noble gas; however, the conversion of methane was considerably affected by the identity of the noble gas. Because the formation of carbon was a severe problem even in the presence of the noble gases, oxidative methane conversion was also evaluated in terms of the carbon balance and product distribution. By adding oxygen to the methane conversion process, the formation of carbon could be suppressed but the production of higher hydrocarbons was also reduced dramatically. Based on these results, it was concluded that the conversion of methane can be enhanced by varying the discharge characteristics, but the problem of carbon balance must be solved without the addition of oxygen. (C) 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available