4.6 Article

A Study on the Characteristics of Beach Profile Evolution According to the Particle Size Variation of Beach Nourishment

Journal

WATER
Volume 15, Issue 16, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/w15162956

Keywords

sediment transport; beach erosion; beach nourishment; physical model test; wind speed; coastal management

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study examined the effects of using nourishment sand with larger particle diameters to perform beach nourishment on an eroding beach. A physical model test was conducted to investigate sediment transport mechanisms under wind and wave conditions. The results showed that while larger particle diameters attenuated sediment transport, the reduction in topographical changes was not always proportional to the increase in particle diameter.
This study investigated the beach nourishment effect and topographical changes when using nourishment sand with relatively large particle diameters to perform beach nourishment on a beach subject to erosion. A physical model test was conducted in a 2D wave flume with an installed wind tunnel. The experiment examined the sediment transport mechanism under conditions with wind and waves. Although applying nourishment sand with large particle diameters attenuated sediment transport, the increase in particle diameter was not always proportional to the reduction in topographical changes. Increasing the particle diameter of the nourishment sand increased the friction force between particles, resulting in large-scale erosion and accretion around the coastline, and this trend increased with winds. Also, with wind, the wave run-up height increased, the undertow became stronger, and large-scale scouring occurred at the boundary between the nourishment sand and the existing beach. Increasing the particle diameter of the nourishment sand played a role in reducing the run-up phenomenon (d(50): 1.0 mm with 24-50%, d(50): 5.0 mm with 59-83%), and the range of particles moved by winds also decreased (d(50): 1.0 mm with 10-38%, d(50): 5.0 mm with 5-37%).

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available