4.6 Article

Functional Response of Aquatic Macroinvertebrate Communities to Temporality in Tropical Temporary Ponds

Journal

WATER
Volume 15, Issue 15, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/w15152753

Keywords

functional ecology; temporary wetlands; macroinvertebrate; ponds

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The aim of this research is to determine the effects of hydroperiod on the functional diversity of aquatic and semiaquatic macroinvertebrates in five temporary ponds in Magdalena, Colombia. The study found that the response of the macroinvertebrate communities was associated with the hydroperiod of the ponds.
Temporary or stationary wetlands (ponds) are bodies of shallow water that experience periodic droughts and an irregular flood cycle throughout the year. Although these wetlands are widely distributed in the Colombian territory, there have been few studies on their ecology. The aim of this research is to determine the effects of hydroperiod on the functional diversity of aquatic and semiaquatic macroinvertebrates in five temporary ponds in the department of Magdalena (Colombia). The samplings were performed during the hydroperiods of the filling and drying phases. Samples were collected from all the microhabitats present (sediment, littoral, and limnetic zones). Correlation analyses were performed between the traits and sites in the two hydroperiods, and a multidimensional and comparative analysis of functional diversity was performed, where indices of distance, richness, and functional dispersion were calculated in each hydroperiod. Statistical differences in functional replacement were found for only one of the ponds; however, the other ponds showed a similar trend. These results fit the functional turnover ecological hypothesis in that the response of the aquatic and semiaquatic macroinvertebrate communities was associated with the hydroperiod of the ponds based on the habitat templet theory.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available