4.7 Review

The Difference in Performance and Compatibility between Crystalline and Amorphous Fillers in Mixed Matrix Membranes for Gas Separation (MMMs)

Journal

POLYMERS
Volume 15, Issue 13, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/polym15132951

Keywords

MOFs; PIMs; porous polymers; amorphous polymers; mixed matrix membranes; gas separation; gas transport properties

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A growing number of high-performing gas separation membranes are being reported, but only a few have been commercialized, while the rest are still considered research outcomes. The development of mixed matrix membranes (MMMs) is a common approach to address the issue of rapidly changing performance. This review focuses on investigating and discussing the advantages and disadvantages of incorporating fillers with different morphologies into polymeric membranes, particularly examining the compatibility between inorganic and crystalline fillers and their organic and amorphous counterparts. It concludes with a brief summary of the main findings.
An increasing number of high-performing gas separation membranes is reported almost on a daily basis, yet only a few of them have reached commercialisation while the rest are still considered pure research outcomes. This is often attributable to a rapid change in the performance of these separation systems over a relatively short time. A common approach to address this issue is the development of mixed matrix membranes (MMMs). These hybrid systems typically utilise either crystalline or amorphous additives, so-called fillers, which are incorporated into polymeric membranes at different loadings, with the aim to improve and stabilise the final gas separation performance. After a general introduction to the most relevant models to describe the transport properties in MMMs, this review intends to investigate and discuss the main advantages and disadvantages derived from the inclusion of fillers of different morphologies. Particular emphasis will be given to the study of the compatibility at the interface between the filler and the matrix created by the two different classes of additives, the inorganic and crystalline fillers vs. their organic and amorphous counterparts. It will conclude with a brief summary of the main findings.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available