4.6 Article

Coassembled nanostructured bioscaffold reduces the expression of proinflammatory cytokines to induce apoptosis in epithelial cancer cells

Journal

NANOMEDICINE-NANOTECHNOLOGY BIOLOGY AND MEDICINE
Volume 12, Issue 5, Pages 1397-1407

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.nano.2016.01.009

Keywords

Bionanotechnology; Self-assembly; Cancer; Supramolecular materials; Hydrogels; Tissue engineering

Funding

  1. Australian Research Council (ARC) Discovery Project [DP130103131]
  2. ARC [LE110100141]
  3. NHMRC Career Development Fellowship [APP1050684]
  4. Alfred Deakin Research Fellowship
  5. Australian Microscopy and Microanalysis Research Facility (AMMRF)
  6. Swedish Research Council VR
  7. Institut Laue-Langevin user access programme [8-03-826]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The local inflammatory environment of the cell promotes the growth of epithelial cancers. Therefore, controlling inflammation locally using a material in a sustained, non-steroidal fashion can effectively kill malignant cells without significant damage to surrounding healthy cells. A promising class of materials for such applications is the nanostructured scaffolds formed by epitope presenting minimalist self-assembled peptides; these are bioactive on a cellular length scale, while presenting as an easily handled hydrogel. Here, we show that the assembly process can distribute an anti- inflammatory polysaccharide, fucoidan, localized to the nanofibers within the scaffold to create a biomaterial for cancer therapy. We show that it supports healthy cells, while inducing apoptosis in cancerous epithelial cells, as demonstrated by the significant down-regulation of gene and protein expression pathways associated with epithelial cancer progression. Our findings highlight an innovative material approach with potential applications in local epithelial cancer immunotherapy and drug delivery. (C) 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available