4.6 Article

SMASH: Scalable Method for Analyzing Spatial Heterogeneity of genes in spatial transcriptomics data

Journal

PLOS GENETICS
Volume 19, Issue 10, Pages -

Publisher

PUBLIC LIBRARY SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1010983

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This article introduces a non-parametric method called SMASH for detecting spatially variable genes in high-throughput spatial transcriptomics studies. Compared with other methods, SMASH has superior statistical power and robustness, and can be applied to datasets from different platforms, helping to uncover the structural and functional characteristics of tissues.
In high-throughput spatial transcriptomics (ST) studies, it is of great interest to identify the genes whose level of expression in a tissue covaries with the spatial location of cells/spots. Such genes, also known as spatially variable genes (SVGs), can be crucial to the biological understanding of both structural and functional characteristics of complex tissues. Existing methods for detecting SVGs either suffer from huge computational demand or significantly lack statistical power. We propose a non-parametric method termed SMASH that achieves a balance between the above two problems. We compare SMASH with other existing methods in varying simulation scenarios demonstrating its superior statistical power and robustness. We apply the method to four ST datasets from different platforms uncovering interesting biological insights. In recent years, spatial transcriptomics (ST) has become increasingly popular to study the expression profile of genes across different spatial locations of a tissue. Many of the genes exhibit spatially varying expression patterns making them immensely valuable for understanding the structural and functional properties of the tissue. The proposed method termed SMASH enables powerful and scalable detection of such genes in high-dimensional ST datasets.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available