4.1 Article

Adaptation of closed-chest infarction porcine model to adult Pannon minipigs

Journal

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.vascn.2023.107469

Keywords

Cardiac catheterization; Closed-chest myocardial infarction; cMRI; Large animal model; Minipig

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The aim of the recent study was to collect data on the genotype characteristics of the Hungarian self-bred Pannon minipigs using a standardized infarct model procedure. The study found that the cardiac function of these pigs changed during the closed chest AMI procedure, and a certain percentage of malignant arrhythmias occurred, but the heart showed excellent compensatory capacity.
The aim of the recent study was to collect data on the genotype characteristics of the Hungarian self-bred Pannon minipigs by adapting a standardized infarct model procedure. Closed chest AMI was induced by balloon occlusion for 90 min in the left anterior descendent coronary artery (LAD) in 24 adult intact female minipigs followed by reperfusion. To assess the left ventricular (LV) function, serial cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (cMRI) was performed prior to the experimental procedure, on day 3 post-AMI (72 +/- 12 h), and at 1 month follow-up (Day 30 +/- 2 days). Compared to baseline cMRI scans the end-diastolic volume (EDV) was increased on days 3 and 30 On day 3 the left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) decreased significantly but there was no statistical difference between the baseline and day 30 measurements. Cardiac output, stroke volume, and endsystolic volume significantly were increased compared to baseline on day 30 A high percentage (54%) of malignant arrhythmias occurred during the AMI procedure, with a 25% mortality rate. The compensatory capacity of the Pannon minipig heart is excellent therefore the use of different cardiac parameters and invasive measurements is advisable in chronic pharmacological experiments to complement cMRI data.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available