4.7 Article

Efficacy and pharmacokinetics of a modified acid-labile docetaxel-PRINT® nanoparticle formulation against non-small-cell lung cancer brain metastases

Journal

NANOMEDICINE
Volume 11, Issue 15, Pages 1947-1955

Publisher

FUTURE MEDICINE LTD
DOI: 10.2217/nnm-2016-0147

Keywords

acid-labile docetaxel prodrug; blood-brain barrier; Particle Replication in Non-wetting Templates (PRINT)(R) PLGA nanoparticle

Funding

  1. Novartis
  2. Sanofi
  3. toBBB
  4. GERON
  5. Angio-chem
  6. Merrimack
  7. PUMA
  8. Lily
  9. Merck
  10. Oncothyreon
  11. National Cancer Institute [K23CA157728]
  12. Breast Cancer Research Foundation-AACR Grant for Translational Breast Cancer Research [10-60-26-ANDE]
  13. Damon Runyon Cancer Research Foundation [CI-64-12]
  14. Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center University of North Carolina SPORE Career Development Award [5P50CA058223]
  15. University Cancer Research Fund
  16. Carolina Center for Cancer Nanotechnology Excellence [U54CA151652]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Aim: Particle Replication in Nonwetting Templates (PRINT (R)) PLGA nanoparticles of docetaxel and acid-labile C2-dimethyl-Si-Docetaxel were evaluated with small molecule docetaxel as treatments for non-small-cell lung cancer brain metastases. Materials & methods: Pharmacokinetics, survival, tumor growth and mice weight change were efficacy measures against intracranial A549 tumors in nude mice. Treatments were administered by intravenous injection. Results: Intracranial tumor concentrations of PRINT-docetaxel and PRINT-C2-docetaxel were 13- and sevenfold greater, respectively, than SM-docetaxel. C2-docetaxel conversion to docetaxel was threefold higher in intracranial tumor as compared with nontumor tissues. PRINT-C2-docetaxel increased median survival by 35% with less toxicity as compared with other treatments. Conclusion: The decreased toxicity of the PRINT-C2-docetaxel improved treatment efficacy against non-small-cell lung cancer brain metastasis.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available