4.7 Article

Evaluating the Impact of Long-Term Land Use Change and Age since Disturbance on Soil Faunal Diversity

Journal

FORESTS
Volume 14, Issue 9, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/f14091882

Keywords

biodiversity; anthropogenic disturbance; chronosequence; management; soil fauna

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Soil organisms, particularly soil arthropods, play a crucial role in maintaining soil properties and ecosystem services. This study examined the diversity and abundance of soil arthropods along a chronosequence of land use types and found that land use type and age since disturbance significantly influenced the community composition of soil fauna, with woodlands hosting richer arthropod communities compared to recently managed grassland.
Soil organisms are the biological drivers of processes and functions that maintain soil properties and ecosystem services. Soil fauna contribute to nutrient turnover, decomposition and other important biogeochemical processes. This investigation assessed the diversity and abundance of soil arthropods (0.1-4 mm) along a chronosequence of land use types covering a relatively small geographical distance but with the same underlying soil type and climatic conditions. The compared habitats and the approximate ages since anthropogenic disturbance were ancient woodland (>200 y), old woodland (<200 y), unimproved semi-natural grassland (>50 y), willow/poplar coppice (>30 y), unimproved permanent pasture (<20 y), improved permanent pasture (<10 y), and recently grazed and reseeded grassland (>2 y), and the soil types of all habitats were the same within a 5 km radius. Land use type and age since anthropogenic disturbance significantly (p < 0.05) influenced the community composition of soil fauna, with richer arthropod communities found in woodlands compared with recently managed grassland. This study has confirmed a significant effect of land use type and age since disturbance on soil faunal diversity and community structure.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available