4.8 Review

Coordination polymers: Challenges and future scenarios for capture and degradation of volatile organic compounds

Journal

NANO RESEARCH
Volume 9, Issue 11, Pages 3181-3208

Publisher

TSINGHUA UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1007/s12274-016-1230-7

Keywords

coordination polymers/metal organic frameworks (CPs/MOFs); volatile organic compounds; sorptive removal; catalytic degradation

Funding

  1. National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) grant - Ministry of Education, Science and Technology (MEST) [2006-0093848]
  2. Cooperative Research Program for Agriculture Science & Technology Development, Rural Development Administration, Republic of Korea [PJ010521]
  3. Science and Engineering Research Board (SERB), New Delhi

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Over the past few decades, coordination polymers/metal organic frameworks (CPs/MOFs) have drawn a great deal of attention for diverse applications due to their advantages of intrinsically tunable chemical structure, flexible architecture, high pore volume, high surface area, multifunctional properties, etc. To date, numerous CPs/MOFs have been developed and employed for the treatment and control of gaseous pollutants, such as volatile organic compounds (VOCs), through capture, sorptive removal, and catalytic degradation. Nevertheless, there are also some key drawbacks and challenges for the practical application of these systems (e.g., poor selectivity, high energy (and fiscal) cost, high synthesis cost, low capacity, and difficulties in regeneration and recycling). In this review, recent developments in CPs/MOFs research are described with their associated mechanisms for capture, sorptive removal, and catalytic degradation of VOCs. To this end, we discuss the key variables and challenges for afforded abatement of VOCs through CPs/MOFs technologies. Hopefully, this review will help the scientific community set future directions for the advancement of CPs/MOFs techniques for the effective management of diverse environmental issues.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available