4.8 Article

DPPA3-HIF1a axis controls colorectal cancer chemoresistance by imposing a slow cell-cycle phenotype

Journal

CELL REPORTS
Volume 42, Issue 8, Pages -

Publisher

CELL PRESS
DOI: 10.1016/j.celrep.2023.112927

Keywords

-

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Tumor relapse and chemoresistance are major challenges in cancer therapy. This study reveals that DPPA3 plays a crucial role in promoting slow-cycling and chemoresistant phenotype in colorectal cancer. The study also uncovers a feedback loop between DPPA3 and HIF1a that regulates cell-cycle progression and highlights the potential of downregulating HIF1a to restore chemosensitivity. Furthermore, DPPA3 overexpression is identified as a biomarker for chemotherapeutic resistance in CRC patients.
Tumor relapse is linked to rapid chemoresistance and represents a bottleneck for cancer therapy success. Engagement of a reduced proliferation state is a non-mutational mechanism exploited by cancer cells to bypass therapy-induced cell death. Through combining functional pulse-chase experiments in engineered cells and transcriptomic analyses, we identify DPPA3 as a master regulator of slow-cycling and chemoresistant phenotype in colorectal cancer (CRC). We find a vicious DPPA3-HIF1a feedback loop that downregulates FOXM1 expression via DNA methylation, thereby delaying cell-cycle progression. Moreover, downregulation of HIF1a partially restores a chemosensitive proliferative phenotype in DPPA3-overexpressing cancer cells. In cohorts of CRC patient samples, DPPA3 overexpression acts as a predictive biomarker of chemotherapeutic resistance that subsequently requires reduction in its expression to allow metastatic outgrowth. Our work demonstrates that slow-cycling cancer cells exploit a DPPA3/HIF1a axis to support tumor persistence under therapeutic stress and provides insights on the molecular regulation of disease progression.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available