4.8 Article

Poly(GR) interacts with key stress granule factors promoting its assembly into cytoplasmic inclusions

Journal

CELL REPORTS
Volume 42, Issue 8, Pages -

Publisher

CELL PRESS
DOI: 10.1016/j.celrep.2023.112822

Keywords

-

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

C9orf72 repeat expansions are the most common genetic cause of frontotemporal dementia (FTD) and amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS). Poly(GR) proteins interact with key proteins involved in stress granule (SG) formation, such as G3BP1 and YTHDF proteins, to promote the formation of toxic cytoplasmic inclusions in neurons, leading to disease progression. Inhibiting the interactions between poly(GR) and these proteins or reducing the levels of poly(GR) may be promising therapeutic strategies for c9FTD/ALS.
C9orf72 repeat expansions are the most common genetic cause of frontotemporal dementia (FTD) and amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS). Poly(GR) proteins are toxic to neurons by forming cytoplasmic inclu-sions that sequester RNA-binding proteins including stress granule (SG) proteins. However, little is known of the factors governing poly(GR) inclusion formation. Here, we show that poly(GR) infiltrates a finely tuned network of protein-RNA interactions underpinning SG formation. It interacts with G3BP1, the key driver of SG assembly and a protein we found is critical for poly(GR) inclusion formation. Moreover, we discovered that N6-methyladenosine (m6A)-modified mRNAs and m6A-binding YTHDF proteins not only co-localize with poly(GR) inclusions in brains of c9FTD/ALS mouse models and patients with c9FTD, they promote poly(GR) inclusion formation via the incorporation of RNA into the inclusions. Our findings thus suggest that interrupting interactions between poly(GR) and G3BP1 or YTHDF1 proteins or decreasing poly(GR) altogether represent promising therapeutic strategies to combat c9FTD/ALS patho-genesis.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available