4.6 Article

Preparation of biodegradable polymeric nanoparticles for pharmaceutical applications using glass capillary microfluidics

Journal

CHEMICAL ENGINEERING SCIENCE
Volume 137, Issue -, Pages 119-130

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ces.2015.06.025

Keywords

Biodegradable nanoparticles; Nanoprecipitation; Microfluidic micromixing; Poly(epsilon-caprolactone); Poly(dl-lactic acid); Glass capillary devices

Funding

  1. European Research Council [280106-CrySys]
  2. EPSRC [EP/H029923/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  3. Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council [EP/H029923/1] Funding Source: researchfish

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The aim of this study was to develop a new microfluidic approach for the preparation of nanoparticles with tuneable sizes based on micromixing/direct nanoprecipitation in a coaxial assembly of tapered-end glass capillaries. The organic phase was 1 wt% poly(epsilon-caprolactone) (PCL) or poly(dl-lactic acid) (PLA) in tetrahydrofuran and the antisolvent was Milli-Qwater. The size of nanoparticles was precisely controlled over a range of 190-650 nm by controlling phase flow rates, orifice size and flow configuration (two-phase co-flow or counter-current flow focusing). Smaller particles were produced in a flow focusing device, because the organic phase stream was significantly narrower than the orifice and remained narrow for a longer distance downstream of the orifice. The mean size of PCL particles produced in a flow focusing device with an orifice size of 200 pm, an organic phase flow rate of 1.7 mL h(-1) and an aqueous-to-organic flow rate ratio of 10 was below 200 nm. The size of nanoparticles decreased with decreasing the orifice size and increasing the aqueous-to-organic phase flow rate ratio. Due to higher affinity for water and amorphous structure, PEA nanoparticles were smaller and exhibited a smoother surface and more rounded shape than PCL particles. (C) 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available