4.6 Review

Mapping the literature on decision regret in patients with non-communicable diseases (NCDs): a scoping review protocol

Journal

BMJ OPEN
Volume 13, Issue 7, Pages -

Publisher

BMJ PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-072703

Keywords

decision making; health equity; health education; health services administration & management

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study aims to investigate decision regret in patients with non-communicable diseases, in order to understand the phenomenon and develop effective interventions. The study will follow the JBI methodology for scoping reviews and is expected to start in July/August 2023 and end in June 2024. The review will include quantitative, qualitative, primary and secondary literature, as well as grey literature on decision regret in patients with NCDs. The results will be presented through tables, figures, and narrative summaries.
IntroductionDecision regret refers to feelings of remorse or dissatisfaction with a decision made regarding the treatment. Mapping the meaningful aspects of decision regret in patients with non-communicable diseases (NCDs) is necessary to provide a comprehensive understanding of the phenomenon and inform the development of effective interventions to address it. For this reason, this protocol aimed to describe the methodological aspects of a scoping review focused on mapping all the meaningful aspects of decision regret in patients with NCDs and provide a conceptual and comprehensive framework of the phenomenon. Methods and analysisThe study described in this protocol will be performed following the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) methodology for scoping reviews. The anticipated starting time is July/August 2023 and the anticipated end of the review is June 2024. This scoping review will include quantitative, qualitative, primary and secondary literature, as well as grey literature on decision regret in patients with NCDs. The systematic search will be performed by consulting PubMed, Embase, Scopus, CINAHL, the Cochrane Library and Google Scholar. English-language articles from any context will be eligible for inclusion. Two independent reviewers will take part in an iterative process of evaluating literature, choosing papers and extracting data. Disagreements among reviewers will be solved through consensus meetings. Results will be presented in relation to the review question by employing tables, figures and narrative summaries. Ethics and disseminationThis scoping review did not require ethical approval since it involves a literature review and does not include new data collection from human participants. The results of the review will provide a summary of the available literature on decision regret experienced by patients with NCDs, which is crucial for developing preventive educational interventions in situations where multiple therapeutic options are available.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available