4.4 Article

Agency and role models: do they matter for adolescent girls' sexual and reproductive health?

Journal

BMC WOMENS HEALTH
Volume 23, Issue 1, Pages -

Publisher

BMC
DOI: 10.1186/s12905-023-02659-8

Keywords

Agency; Role models; Sexual and reproductive health; Adolescent girls; Ethiopia

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Despite declines in early childbearing, many adolescent girls in Ethiopia still lack access to improved sexual and reproductive health due to limited agency and role models. This study found that agency and the presence of role models are positively associated with the ideal age at childbirth. Having family members, friends, or famous individuals as role models is linked to an increase in the ideal age at childbirth. Additionally, agency is associated with a positive attitude towards gender-differentiated parental control.
Despite recent declines in early childbearing in Ethiopia, improved sexual and reproductive health continues to elude many adolescent girls, partially due to constrained agency and role models. This study examined the relationship between agency, role models and two sexual and reproductive health outcomes, ideal age at childbirth and attitude towards gender-differentiated parental control, among adolescent girls in Ethiopia. Agency and role model presence were positively associated with ideal age at childbirth (beta = 0.23, p < .01 and beta = 0.77, p < .001, respectively). Having family members, friends or famous individuals as role models was significantly associated with an increase of 1.45 years (p < .01), 1.32 years (p < .05) and 1.01 years (p < .01) in ideal age at childbirth, respectively, compared to having no role model. Agency was positively associated with attitude towards gender-differentiated parental control of adolescent behaviors (OR = 1.18, p < .001). This study highlights the need for interventions aimed at increasing agency and providing role models for adolescent girls.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available