4.4 Article

Insight into stagnant point flow of Eyring-Powell hybrid nanofluid comprising on enlarged version of Yamada-Ota and Xue model

Journal

ADVANCES IN MECHANICAL ENGINEERING
Volume 15, Issue 10, Pages -

Publisher

SAGE PUBLICATIONS LTD
DOI: 10.1177/16878132231206922

Keywords

Hybrid fluid; Eyring fluid; stagnation point; thermal radiation; nanofluid

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This paper investigates the stagnant point flow of Powell-Eyring hybrid nanofluids caused by a stretching sheet and compares two models based on hybrid nanoliquid. The numerical solution of equations is obtained using the bvp4c technique, and the significance of physical quantities such as thermal, velocity, force friction, and heat transport is explained in terms of tables and graphs. The analysis reveals that the Xue model produces less heat transport compared to the Yamada-Ota hybrid nanofluid.
This paper shows the stagnant point flow of Powell-Eyring hybrid nanofluids due to a stretching sheet. The Xue and Yamada-Ota based on hybrid nanoliquid have been subjected to a comparison study that has been scrutinized. The suspension of two nanoparticles AA 7072 and AA 7075 with base fluid Ethylene glycol ( EG ) is studied through hybrid nanoliquid. With the implementation of the noteworthy suitable alteration, the system of equations in terms of ODEs is established. The bvp4c technique is then applied to obtain the numerical solution of reduced ODEs. The significance of physical quantities over thermal, velocity, force friction, and heat transport are elaborated in tabular form and also in graphical form. During this analysis, the Xue model produced less heat transport as compared to the Yamada-Ota hybrid nanofluid. The result shows that the Xue model produces less heat gradient equated to the Yamada-Ota model. The velocity profile is enhanced and the thermal profile has decayed with the larger value of the fluid parameter.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available