4.5 Article

Standalone versus Anterior Cervical Plating for One-To-Two Level Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion: A Propensity Score-Matched Comparative Study

Journal

WORLD NEUROSURGERY
Volume 177, Issue -, Pages E673-E679

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.wneu.2023.06.121

Keywords

ACDF; Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion; Cervical degenerative disease; Cervical plating; Standalone

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In this study, the procedural success and outcomes of 1-2 level ACDF with and without cervical plating were compared, and similar effectiveness and outcomes were reported.
-BACKGROUND: Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) can be performed with and without supportive anterior cervical plating. Fusion rates, incidence of dysphagia, and repeat surgery are concerns when performing ACDF with or without plating. We aimed to compare procedural success and outcomes between patients treated with and without cervical plating for 1-2 level ACDF. -METHODS: A prospectively maintained database was retrospectively searched for patients who underwent 1-2 level ACDF surgery. Patients were divided into cohorts treated with plating and without (standalone). Propensity score matching (PSM) was performed to eliminate se-lection bias and control for baseline comorbidities and disease severity. Patient demographics (including age, body mass index, smoking status, diabetes mellitus, osteoporosis), disease presentation (cervical stenosis, degenerative disc disease), and operative details (num-ber of operative levels, cage type used, intraoperative, and postoperative complications) were recorded. Out-comes assessed were fusion observed at 3, 6, and 12 months, patient-reported postoperative pain, and any repeat surgeries. Univariate analysis was performed according to data normality and variables for PSM cohorts.RESULTS: A total of 365 patients were identified (plating =289, standalone=76). After PSM, 130 patients (65 in each group) were included for final analysis. Similar mean operative times (101.3 +/- 26.5-standalone; 104.8 +/- 32.2 -plating; P = 0.5) and mean hospital stays (1.2 +/- 1.8 -standalone; 0.7 +/- 0.7-plating; P = 0.1) were noted. Twelve-month fusion rates were also similar (84.6% -standalone; 89.2%-plating; P = 0.6). Repeat surgery rates were equivalent (13.8%-standalone; 12.3%-plating; P = 0.8).CONCLUSIONS: In this propensity score-matched case -control study, we report comparable effectiveness and outcomes of performing 1-2 level ACDF with and without cervical plating.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available