4.7 Article

Contextual fear memory impairment in Angelman syndrome model mice is associated with altered transcriptional responses

Journal

SCIENTIFIC REPORTS
Volume 13, Issue 1, Pages -

Publisher

NATURE PORTFOLIO
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-023-45769-x

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Angelman syndrome is a rare neurogenetic disorder characterized by severe developmental delay, cognitive impairment, and motor dysfunction. A study on mice with Angelman syndrome found that their memory recall fails to activate memory-associated transcriptional programs, which could be responsible for their memory impairment.
Angelman syndrome (AS) is a rare neurogenetic disorder caused by UBE3A deficiency and characterized by severe developmental delay, cognitive impairment, and motor dysfunction. In the present study, we performed RNA-seq on hippocampal samples from both wildtype (WT) and AS male mice, with or without contextual fear memory recall. There were 281 recall-associated differentially expressed genes (DEGs) in WT mice and 268 DEGs in AS mice, with 129 shared by the two genotypes. Gene ontology analysis showed that extracellular matrix and stimulation-induced response genes were prominently enriched in recall-associated DEGs in WT mice, while nuclear acid metabolism and tissue development genes were highly enriched in those from AS mice. Further analyses showed that the 129 shared DEGs belonged to nuclear acid metabolism and tissue development genes. Unique recall DEGs in WT mice were enriched in biological processes critical for synaptic plasticity and learning and memory, including the extracellular matrix network clustered around fibronectin 1 and collagens. In contrast, AS-specific DEGs were not enriched in any known pathways. These results suggest that memory recall in AS mice, while altering the transcriptome, fails to recruit memory-associated transcriptional programs, which could be responsible for the memory impairment in AS mice.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available