Pupil response patterns distinguish true from false memories

Memory is reconstructive and error-prone, which make memory illusions very common in everyday life. However, studying memory illusions can provide valuable insights into how memory works. Pupil response has emerged, in recent years, as an indicator of memory encoding and retrieval, however its validity as a measure of memory success is debated. In this study, we explored whether pupil response patterns can differentiate true from false memories and whether variations in the temporal dynamics of pupil response can elucidate the mechanisms underlying false memory creation. The Deese-Roediger-McDermott (DRM) paradigm was employed to generate false memories in two separate experiments involving visual and auditory stimuli. Pupil responses effectively differentiated true from false memories based on variations in pupil amplitude at different temporal components. This discrimination remained consistent across both experiments, with slightly stronger effects in the auditory condition, aligning with the more pronounced false memory effects in this condition. Notably, differential pupil responses between true and false memories varied based on the type of memory involved at recognition. These findings provide valuable insights into the cognitive processes underlying memory distortions, with implications for theoretical frameworks and real-world contexts.

Automated summary

Memory is reconstructive and prone to errors, resulting in common memory illusions. Studying memory illusions can help understand how memory works. Pupil response has been considered as an indicator of memory encoding and retrieval, but its validity as a measure of memory success is still debated. This study found that pupil response patterns can differentiate true from false memories, and variations in the temporal dynamics of pupil response can elucidate the mechanisms underlying false memory creation. These insights have implications for theoretical frameworks and real-world contexts.