4.7 Article

The full-body illusion changes visual depth perception

Journal

SCIENTIFIC REPORTS
Volume 13, Issue 1, Pages -

Publisher

NATURE PORTFOLIO
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-023-37715-8

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study investigates the impact of experimentally induced changes in perceived self-location on space perception. The full-body illusion is used to differentiate real and apparent body positions. The results show that the illusion-induced forward drift in self-location affects our perception of objects in depth. It is found that task performance significantly improves for the right visual field, indicating enhanced depth perception.
Knowing where objects are relative to us implies knowing where we are relative to the external world. Here, we investigated whether space perception can be influenced by an experimentally induced change in perceived self-location. To dissociate real and apparent body positions, we used the full-body illusion. In this illusion, participants see a distant avatar being stroked in virtual reality while their own physical back is simultaneously stroked. After experiencing the discrepancy between the seen and the felt location of the stroking, participants report a forward drift in self-location toward the avatar. We wondered whether this illusion-induced forward drift in self-location would affect where we perceive objects in depth. We applied a psychometric measurement in which participants compared the position of a probe against a reference sphere in a two-alternative forced choice task. We found a significant improvement in task performance for the right visual field, indicated by lower just-noticeable differences, i.e., participants were better at judging the differences of the two spheres in depth. Our results suggest that the full-body illusion is able to facilitate depth perception at least unilaterally, implying that depth perception is influenced by perceived self-location.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available