4.8 Article

Kinetics-Driven Crystal Facets Evolution at the Tip of Nanowires: A New Implementation of the Ostwald-Lussac Law

Journal

NANO LETTERS
Volume 16, Issue 11, Pages 7078-7084

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.nanolett.6b03317

Keywords

Nanowire growth; crystal facets evolution; Ostwald-Lussac law; kinetics control; supersaturation

Funding

  1. Air Force Office of Scientific Research [FA9550-13-1-0168]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Nanocrystal facets evolution is critical for designing nanomaterial morphology and controlling their properties. In this work, we report a unique high-energy crystal facets evolution phenomenon at the tips of wurtzite zinc oxide nanowires (NWs). As the zinc vapor super saturation decreased at the NW deposition region, the NW tip facets evolved from the (0001) surface to the {10 (1) over bar3} surface and subsequently to the {11 (2) over bar2} surface and eventually back to the flat (0001) surface. A series of NW tip morphology was observed in accordance to the different combinations of exposed facets. Exposure of the high-energy facets was attributed to the fluctuation of the energy barriers for the formation of different crystal facets during the layer-by-layer growth of the NW tip. The energy barrier differences between these crystal facets were quantified from the surface area ratios as a function of supersaturation. On the basis of the experimental observation and kinetics analysis, we argue that at appropriate deposition conditions exposure of the crystal facets at NW growth front is not merely determined by the surface energy. Instead, the NW may choose to expose the facets with minimal formation energy barrier, which can be determined by the Ehrlich-Schwoebel barrier variation. This empirical law for the NW tip facet formation was in analogy to the Ostwald Lussac law of phase transformation, which brings a new insight toward nanostructure design and controlled synthesis.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available