4.7 Article

Evaluating Brewers' Spent Grain Protein Isolate Postprandial Amino Acid Uptake Kinetics: A Randomized, Cross-Over, Double-Blind Controlled Study

Journal

NUTRIENTS
Volume 15, Issue 14, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/nu15143196

Keywords

barley; brewer's spent grain (BSG); EverPro; proteins; amino acid uptake; protein quality; upcycling

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study aimed to evaluate the nutritional value of upcycled barley/rice proteins (BRP) extracted from brewers' spent grain (BSG) and compare it with pea proteins (PP). The results showed that the amino acid uptake of BRP was comparable to PP, indicating the potential for optimizing protein quality for overall health.
Valorization and utilization of brewers' spent grain (BSG) are of great interest in terms of reducing food waste and promoting more sustainable food systems. In this study, we aimed to evaluate the nutritional value of upcycled barley/rice proteins (BRP) extracted from BSG and compare this with pea proteins (PP). A randomized, cross-over, double-blind controlled trial was conducted with twelve participants (age: 24 & PLUSMN; 2.8 years, BMI: 23.3 & PLUSMN; 3.0 kg/m(2)). During three separate visits with a one-week washout period between visits, participants received 20 g BRP, PP, or the benchmark protein whey (WP). Blood-free amino acids (AA) were measured to determine postprandial AA uptake kinetics. The estimated total AA (TAA) uptake of BRP was 69% when compared to WP and 87% when compared to PP. The time to reach the maximum values was similar between the three protein sources. When comparing individual essential AA responses between BRP and PP, we observed higher responses in methionine and tryptophane and lower responses in lysine, histidine, and isoleucine for BRP compared to PP. This study demonstrates that BRP exhibits comparable postprandial TAA uptake profiles to PP. The findings highlight the complementarity of BRP and PP, which may offer the potential for blending approaches to optimize protein quality for overall health.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available