4.7 Article

Preeclampsia and Its Impact on Human Milk Activin A Concentration

Journal

NUTRIENTS
Volume 15, Issue 19, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/nu15194296

Keywords

human milk; breastfeeding; activin A; preeclampsia; newborn nutrition; neurobiomarker

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study investigated the effects of preeclampsia on activin A levels and found that the lactation phase had a significant effect on the concentration of activin A, while there were no significant differences between preeclamptic and normotensive women. The results suggest that the beneficial properties of breast milk can be maintained even if preeclampsia occurs.
Background: It is known that preeclampsia affects lactogenesis. However, data on the effects of this pathology on human milk neurobiomarker composition are not available. The aim of this study is to investigate the effects of this gestational pathology on activin A levels, a neurobiomarker known to play an important role in the development and protection of the central nervous system. Methods: The women recruited were divided in two different study groups: preeclamptic or normotensive women. All the human milk samples were collected using the same procedure. Activin A was quantified using an Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) test. To investigate the effect of preeclampsia on the activin A concentration in the three lactation phases, a mixed linear model with a unistructural covariance structure, with the mother as the random effect, and fixed effects were performed. Results: Activin A was detected in all samples. There were no significant differences between preeclamptic and normotensive women. The only significant effect is related to the lactation phase: the difference between colostrum and mature milk (p < 0.01) was significant. In conclusion, these results allow us to affirm that breast milk's beneficial properties are maintained even if preeclampsia occurs.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available