4.8 Article

Marine biodiversity exposed to prolonged and intense subsurface heatwaves

Journal

NATURE CLIMATE CHANGE
Volume -, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

NATURE PORTFOLIO
DOI: 10.1038/s41558-023-01790-6

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study estimates the intensity and duration of global marine heatwaves (MHWs) and explores the impact of subsurface MHWs on biodiversity. The results show higher intensity of MHWs at subsurface depths and increased duration with depth. Regions with high cumulative intensity overlap with the warm range of species distributions, making them more sensitive to thermal stress.
Marine heatwaves (MHWs) are becoming increasingly common, with devastating ecosystem impacts. However, MHW understanding has almost exclusively relied on sea surface temperature with limited knowledge about their subsurface characteristics. Here we estimate global MHWs from the surface to 2,000 m depth, covering the period 1993-2019, and explore biodiversity exposure to their effects. We find that MHWs are typically more intense in the subsurface at 50-200 m and their duration increases up to twofold with depth, although with large spatial variability linked to different oceanographic conditions. Cumulative intensity (a thermal stress proxy) was highest in the upper 250 m, exposing subsurface biodiversity to MHW effects. This can be particularly concerning for up to 22% of the ocean, where high cumulative intensity overlapped the warm range edge of species distributions, thus being more sensitive to thermal stress. Subsurface MHWs can hence drive biodiversity patterns, with consequent effects on ecological interactions and ecosystem processes. The authors estimate the intensity, duration and number of global marine heatwaves from 1993 to 2019, from the surface to 2,000 m. They show generally higher intensity of marine heatwaves at 50-200 m, but increased duration with depth, and predict ocean regions of higher biodiversity exposure.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available