4.6 Article

The Effect of Substitution of Mn by Pd on the Structure and Thermomagnetic Properties of the Mn1-xPdxCoGe Alloys (Where x=0.03, 0.05, 0.07 and 0.1)

Journal

MATERIALS
Volume 16, Issue 15, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/ma16155394

Keywords

X-ray diffraction; DSC measurements; microstructure; magnetocaloric effect

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The present study investigates the influence of partial substitution of Mn by Pd on structure, thermomagnetic properties, and phase transitions in the MnCoGe alloys. The research reveals the existence of orthorhombic TiNiSi-type and hexagonal Ni2Ti-type phases. The increase in Pd content leads to changes in lattice parameters and phase quantity, as well as an increase in Curie temperature.
In the present paper, the influence of partial substitution of Mn by Pd on structure, thermomagnetic properties, and phase transitions in the MnCoGe alloys was investigated. The studies of phase constitution revealed an occurrence of the orthorhombic TiNiSi-type and hexagonal Ni2Ti- type phases. Deep analysis of the XRD pattern supported by the Rietveld analysis allowed us to notice the changes in lattice parameters and quantity of recognized phases depending on the Pd content. An increase of palladium in alloy composition at the expense of manganese induced a rise in the Curie temperature. The values of Delta S-M measured for the variation of external magnetic field similar to 5 T equaled 8.88, 23.99, 15.63, and 11.09 for Mn0.97Pd0.03CoGe, Mn0.95Pd0.05CoGe, Mn0.93Pd0.07CoGe, and Mn0.9Pd0.1CoGe alloy, respectively. The highest magnetic entropy change Delta SM was observed for samples with Pd content x = 0.05 induced by magnetostructural transformation. The analysis of the n vs. T curves allowed confirmation of the XRD and DSC results of an occurrence of the first-order magnetostructural transition in Mn0.95Pd0.05CoGe and Mn0.93Pd0.07CoGe alloys samples.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available