4.6 Article

The Effects of Partial Replacement of Ground Granulated Blast Furnace Slag by Ground Wood Ash on Alkali-Activated Binder Systems

Journal

MATERIALS
Volume 16, Issue 15, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/ma16155347

Keywords

wood ash; wood fly ash; ground granulated blast furnace slag; alkali-activated; mortar; ball mill; grinding; isothermal calorimetry

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Cement production is a major contributor to carbon dioxide emissions. Alkali-activated materials offer an environmentally friendly alternative by utilizing waste materials and industrial by-products, while still providing comparable strength, durability, and low carbon emissions. Wood ash shows promise as a partial replacement for Portland cement in alkali-activated systems, improving mechanical properties but also increasing porosity of the binder matrix.
Cement production contributes significantly to carbon dioxide emissions. Alkali-activated materials offer an environmentally friendly alternative due to their comparable strength, durability and low-carbon emissions while utilizing wastes and industrial by-products. Wood ash is a waste material that shows promising results as a partial replacement for Portland cement and precursors in alkali-activated systems. The aim of this study was to examine the effect of ground wood ash on the mechanical properties of alkali-activated mortars. Wood ash was incorporated as a 0 wt%, 10 wt% and 20 wt% partial replacement for ground granulated blast furnace slag (GGBFS). The wood ashes were ground in a planetary ball mill for 10 and 20 min. Sodium silicate (Na2SiO3), sodium carbonate (Na2CO3), and sodium hydroxide (NaOH) were used as alkali activators. The results demonstrated that ground wood ash improved the mechanical properties of alkali-activated systems compared to untreated wood ash. However, the incorporation of wood ash increased the porosity of the binder matrix.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available