4.6 Review

Lead-Free Halide Perovskite Nanocrystals for Light-Emitting Diodes

Journal

MATERIALS
Volume 16, Issue 18, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/ma16186317

Keywords

halide perovskite light-emitting diodes; lead-free halide perovskite nanocrystals; perovskite nanocrystal emitters; eco-friendly perovskite nanocrystals

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Lead-based halide perovskite nanocrystals have shown great potential for use in LEDs, but due to environmental toxicity, lead-free perovskite nanocrystals have emerged as a promising alternative. This review analyzes the compositions and performance of lead-free perovskite nanocrystals in LEDs, and discusses the challenges and prospects of using lead-free perovskite nanocrystals in LED technologies.
Lead-based halide perovskite nanocrystals (PeNCs) have demonstrated remarkable potential for use in light-emitting diodes (LEDs). This is because of their high photoluminescence quantum yield, defect tolerance, tunable emission wavelength, color purity, and high device efficiency. However, the environmental toxicity of Pb has impeded their commercial viability owing to the restriction of hazardous substances directive. Therefore, Pb-free PeNCs have emerged as a promising solution for the development of eco-friendly LEDs. This review article presents a detailed analysis of the various compositions of Pb-free PeNCs, including tin-, bismuth-, antimony-, and copper-based perovskites and double perovskites, focusing on their stability, optoelectronic properties, and device performance in LEDs. Furthermore, we address the challenges encountered in using Pb-free PeNC-LEDs and discuss the prospects and potential of these Pb-free PeNCs as sustainable alternatives to lead-based PeLEDs. In this review, we aim to shed light on the current state of Pb-free PeNC LEDs and highlight their significance in driving the development of eco-friendly LED technologies.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available