4.2 Article

Expectations from stuttering therapy: Qualitative content analysis of client's perspective in Kannada-speaking adults who stutter

Journal

JOURNAL OF COMMUNICATION DISORDERS
Volume 107, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcomdis.2023.106388

Keywords

Stuttering; Qualitative research; Content analysis; Therapy expectation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The purpose of this study was to explore clients' expectations from stuttering therapy in the Indian context. The findings suggest that selecting personalized goals and techniques during therapy is necessary to improve client satisfaction.
Purpose: The current study was carried out to explore clients' expectations from stuttering therapy using the qualitative content method in the Indian context. Method: Twenty-one Kannada-speaking adults who stutter between the age range of 18-33 years participated in the study. The procedure involved three phases, including the formulation of semistructured interview questions, data collection and analysis. Inductive content analysis was used to determine the categories and sub-categories arising from the participants verbatim. The frequency count of emerging sub-categories was completed, and the data was interpreted. Results: The overall analysis of the data obtained from 21 participants generated three categories under the theme of expectations from speech therapy. The categories generated included beliefs and understanding of stuttering, stuttering and related behaviours, and goals and outcome of therapy. Conclusion: Selecting personalised goals and techniques during therapy is necessary to improve client satisfaction. This study helps clinicians to understand the anticipatory beliefs of Kannadaspeaking adults who stutter and educate them about achievable and realistic goals, leading to shared decision-making to ensure better quality of life and satisfaction in everyday speaking situations.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available