4.5 Editorial Material

The opioid prescribing problem: an opportunity to embed rigorous evaluation within initiatives to improve population healthcare

Related references

Note: Only part of the references are listed.
Article Health Care Sciences & Services

Reducing opioid use for chronic non-cancer pain in primary care using an evidence-based, theory-informed, multistrategic, multistakeholder approach: a single-arm time series with segmented regression

Anna K. Moffat et al.

Summary: A national intervention was implemented to reduce opioid use among patients with chronic non-cancer pain, which included various strategies such as audit and feedback, deprescribing guidance, pain neuroscience education, and increasing utilization of psychologist services.

BMJ QUALITY & SAFETY (2023)

Article Health Care Sciences & Services

Clinician Perceptions of Receiving Different Forms of Feedback on their Opioid Prescribing

Tamar Klaiman et al.

Summary: Opioid misuse is a significant public health issue in the United States, primarily caused by overprescription for acute pain. However, little research has been done on obtaining clinician feedback to reduce opioid prescribing. In this study, qualitative analyses were conducted with clinicians who received monthly feedback about their opioid prescribing behaviors. The study found that clinicians appreciated the feedback and found comparative data with their peers to be most useful. Sharing opioid prescribing feedback data with clinicians can be an effective strategy in addressing the issue among emergency and urgent care clinicians.

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF MEDICAL QUALITY (2023)

Article Public, Environmental & Occupational Health

Global, regional, and national trends in opioid analgesic consumption from 2015 to 2019: a longitudinal study

Chengsheng Ju et al.

Lancet Public Health (2022)

Article Medicine, General & Internal

Effectiveness of Enhanced Performance Feedback on Appropriate Use of Blood Transfusions A Comparison of 2 Cluster Randomized Trials

Simon J. Stanworth et al.

Summary: This study evaluated two feedback interventions to improve the appropriate use of blood transfusions and found that optimizing feedback usability and guiding local action did not increase the appropriate use of blood transfusions more effectively than standard feedback.

JAMA NETWORK OPEN (2022)

Article Medicine, General & Internal

The effects of an evidence- and theory-informed feedback intervention on opioid prescribing for non-cancer pain in primary care: A controlled interrupted time series analysis

Sarah L. Alderson et al.

Summary: The study found that using comparative feedback interventions in primary care can effectively reduce the prescribing of opioid medications, including strong opioids and in high-risk patient groups. Additionally, feedback can prompt clinicians to reconsider prescribing other medicines associated with chronic pain without causing an increase in referrals to musculoskeletal clinics.

PLOS MEDICINE (2021)

Article Primary Health Care

General practice responses to opioid prescribing feedback: a qualitative process evaluation

Su Wood et al.

Summary: In this study, general practice staff were found to prioritize reducing opioid prescribing. Some practices were encouraged to make changes through feedback. The non-prescriptive nature of the feedback reports allowed practices to develop strategies consistent with their own ways of working and existing resources.

BRITISH JOURNAL OF GENERAL PRACTICE (2021)

Article Medicine, General & Internal

Trends in long-term opioid prescriptions for musculoskeletal conditions in Australian general practice: a national longitudinal study using MedicineInsight, 2012-2018

Sean Black-Tiong et al.

Summary: The study found a rising trend in the prevalence of long-term opioid prescribing from 2012 to 2018, with a slight decrease in incidence in 2018. Individual risk factors included increasing age, identifying as Aboriginal or Torres Strait Islander, and living in disadvantaged areas. The duration of long-term opioid prescriptions decreased in the past few years.

BMJ OPEN (2021)

Editorial Material Medicine, General & Internal

Low risk pragmatic trials do not always require participants' informed consent

Rafael Dal-Re et al.

BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL (2019)

Editorial Material Medicine, General & Internal

Creating a Learning Health System through Rapid-Cycle, Randomized Testing

Leora I. Horwitz et al.

NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE (2019)

Article Medicine, General & Internal

Practice Feedback Interventions: 15 Suggestions for Optimizing Effectiveness

Jamie C. Brehaut et al.

ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE (2016)

Article Primary Health Care

Understanding long-term opioid prescribing for non-cancer pain in primary care: a qualitative study

Carolyn McCrorie et al.

BMC FAMILY PRACTICE (2015)

Article Health Care Sciences & Services

A reanalysis of cluster randomized trials showed interrupted time-series studies were valuable in health system evaluation

Atle Fretheim et al.

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY (2015)

Article Social Sciences, Interdisciplinary

Radical Incrementalism

David Halpern et al.

EVALUATION (2015)

Review Medicine, General & Internal

Audit and feedback: effects on professional practice and healthcare outcomes

N. Ivers et al.

COCHRANE DATABASE OF SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS (2012)