Journal
BMC SURGERY
Volume 23, Issue 1, Pages -Publisher
BMC
DOI: 10.1186/s12893-023-02107-2
Keywords
Pancreatoduodenectomy; Laparoscopy; Single-incision plus one port; Pain score; Cosmetic result
Categories
Ask authors/readers for more resources
This study evaluated the short-term outcomes of single-incision plus one-port laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy (SILPD + 1) compared with conventional laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy (CLPD). The SILPD + 1 group had shorter operation time, lower postoperative pain scores, and improved cosmetic results compared with the CLPD group. However, there were no significant differences in other variables between the two groups.
BackgroundThe use of single-incision plus one-port laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy (SILPD + 1) has been never reported, and its safety and efficacy remain unknown. This study aimed to evaluate the short-term outcomes of SILPD + 1 compared with those of conventional laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy (CLPD).MethodFifty-seven cases of laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy (LPD) were performed between November 2021, and March 2022. Among them, 10 cases of LPD were performed using a single-incision plus one-port device. Based on the same inclusion and exclusion criteria, 47 cases of LPD performed using traditional 5-trocar were included as a control group. The patient's demographic characteristics, intraoperative, and postoperative variables were prospectively collected and retrospectively analyzed.ResultsThree men and seven women were included in the SILPD + 1 group. All baseline parameters of both groups were comparable, except for age. Patients were younger in the SILPD + 1 group (47.2 & PLUSMN; 18.3 years vs. 60.6 & PLUSMN; 11.7 years, P = 0.05) than that in the CLPD group. Compared with the CLPD group, median operation time (222.5 (208.8-245.0) vs. 305.0 (256.0-37.0) min, P < 0.001) was shorter, median postoperative VAS scores on days 1-3 were lower, and median cosmetic score (21.0 (19.0-23.5) vs. 17.0 (16.0-20.0), P = 0.026) was higher one month after the surgery in the SILPD + 1 group. The estimated blood loss, conversion rate, blood-transfusion rate, exhaust time, time of drainage tube removal, postoperative hospital stays, and perioperative complications were comparable between the two groups.ConclusionIn a high-volume LPD center, SILPD + 1 is safe and feasible for well-selected patients without increasing the operation time and complications. It even has the advantages of reduced postoperative pain and improved cosmetic results.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available