4.6 Article

Confocal corrected attenuation coefficient imaging in phantoms and in vivo using chromatic focal shift calibration

Journal

BIOMEDICAL OPTICS EXPRESS
Volume 14, Issue 10, Pages 5282-5297

Publisher

Optica Publishing Group
DOI: 10.1364/BOE.498459

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Optical coherence tomography (OCT) is used for imaging tissue structures, and calibrating intensity values can provide information on the tissue's optical properties. This study explores the feasibility of extracting the focus position from OCT scans using the system's chromatic aberration.
Optical coherence tomography (OCT) is conventionally used for structural imaging of tissue. Calibrating the intensity values of OCT images can give information on the tissue's inherent optical properties, such as the attenuation coefficient, which can provide an additional parameter to quantify possible pathological changes. To obtain calibrated intensity values, the focus position and Rayleigh length of the incident beam need to be known. We explore the feasibility of extracting the focus position from an OCT scan acquired with a single focus setting using the chromatic aberration of the system. The chromatic focal shift of an OCT system is exploited to achieve different focus positions for sub-spectrum reconstructed OCT images. The ratios of these images are used to estimate the focus position. Reconstruction of a high-resolution B-scan from coherent addition of sub-spectrum confocal function corrected B-scans and subsequent high-resolution OCT attenuation coefficient imaging is demonstrated. Furthermore, we introduce a method to experimentally determine the chromatic focal shifts of an OCT system in phantoms and an in vivo human retina. These shifts are compared to the theoretically expected shifts calculated with ray tracing.(c) 2023 Optica Publishing Group under the terms of the Optica Open Access Publishing Agreement

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available