4.5 Article

Development of a Dot-Blot Assay for the Detection of Mould-Specific IgE in the Belgian Population

Journal

MYCOPATHOLOGIA
Volume 182, Issue 3-4, Pages 319-329

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s11046-016-0091-7

Keywords

IgE detection; Dot-blot; Mould sensitization; Indoor mould species

Categories

Funding

  1. Belgian Scientific Policy (BELSPO) through an Ylieff fellowship

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background Data on mould sensitization in the general population are scarce and mostly on Aspergillus fumigatus, Alternaria alternata and Cladosporium herbarum. Objectives To validate a dot-blot assay for the detection of specific IgE and evaluate the prevalence of mould sensitization in a healthy population. Methods The dot-blot assay was validated against the CAP test. Sensitization rate to ten common indoor and outdoor mould species in 344 serum samples was calculated. For each serum with more than one reactivity, the major sensitization'' defined as the strongest response against a single mould species was calculated. Results Intra-and inter-assay variations were both below 20%, and the positivity threshold of the test was of 0.418 kU/L for A. fumigatus. Correlation with CAP results was strong. The overall prevalence of sensitization was 32.8%, and the commonest sensitizations were against A. alternaria, A. flavus and A. niger (around 15%). The most frequent major reactivities'' were against A. niger and A. alternata (20-30%). In 25.1% of the samples, major reactivities'' were directed against a group of moulds commonly found indoor (Penicillium spp., Aspergillus versicolor, Cladosporium sphaerospermum and Cladosporium cladosporioides). Conclusions The dot-blot assay was validated for the detection of mould-specific IgE. In the general population, sensitization to indoor species was common and accounted for 25% of overall mould sensitizations.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available