4.8 Article

Machine Learning-Guided Protein Engineering

Journal

ACS CATALYSIS
Volume 13, Issue 21, Pages 13863-13895

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acscatal.3c02743

Keywords

activity; artificial intelligence; biocatalysis; deep learning; protein design

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Recent progress has been made in engineering biocatalysts using machine learning methods. These methods utilize experimental and simulation data to discover and annotate enzymes, as well as suggest beneficial mutations. The field is expanding to cover various aspects of protein engineering, but there are still challenges to overcome. This Perspective provides an overview of ongoing trends, highlights case studies, and discusses limitations of machine learning-based methods.
Recent progress in engineering highly promising biocatalysts has increasingly involved machine learning methods. These methods leverage existing experimental and simulation data to aid in the discovery and annotation of promising enzymes, as well as in suggesting beneficial mutations for improving known targets. The field of machine learning for protein engineering is gathering steam, driven by recent success stories and notable progress in other areas. It already encompasses ambitious tasks such as understanding and predicting protein structure and function, catalytic efficiency, enantioselectivity, protein dynamics, stability, solubility, aggregation, and more. Nonetheless, the field is still evolving, with many challenges to overcome and questions to address. In this Perspective, we provide an overview of ongoing trends in this domain, highlight recent case studies, and examine the current limitations of machine learning-based methods. We emphasize the crucial importance of thorough experimental validation of emerging models before their use for rational protein design. We present our opinions on the fundamental problems and outline the potential directions for future research.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available